Acta academica karviniensia 2023, 23(2):59-72 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2023.015

Klasifikace zemí Evropské unie v kontextu e-governmentu: shluková analýza

Jiří Slezák
Vysoká škola báňská-Technická univerzita Ostrava, Ekonomická fakulta, Sokolská třída 33, 701 21 Ostrava

E-government is currently a term that has been resonating in the public space for several years, which is why a lot of attention is being paid to it. Some states of the European Union are doing better, and some are worse in this area. Given this trend, all states must increase their efforts towards more effective e-government. The article aims to create clusters of European Union states in 2020 and 2022 according to their level of e-government. The sample consists of 27 states of the European Union, and the indicators used include the E-Government Development Index, E-participation index, Online service index, Telecommunication Infrastructure Index, and Human capital index. In addition, the objective of the article is achieved through correlation and cluster analysis. The countries of the European Union were divided into six clusters in 2020 and 2022. The best cluster in both years includes Finland, Estonia, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden, while the worst countries include, for example, Bulgaria and Romania. In general, the countries that were the best/worst in 2020 are also the best/worst in 2022.

Klíčová slova: cluster analysis, e-government, E-Government Development Index, E-participation index, European Union.
JEL classification: C38, H11, H83, O33

Vloženo: 21. červenec 2023; Revidováno: 1. srpen 2023; Přijato: 22. listopad 2023; Zveřejněno: 4. prosinec 2023  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Slezák J. Klasifikace zemí Evropské unie v kontextu e-governmentu: shluková analýza. Acta academica karviniensia. 2023;23(2):59-72. doi: 10.25142/aak.2023.015.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. ABIED, O., I. OTHMAN and S. KAMA, 2022. Adoption of Cloud Computing in E-Government: A Systematic Literature Review. Science & Technology, 30(1), 655-689. ISSN 0128-7680. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. ANDRONICEANU, A. and I. GEORGESCU, 2021. E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65-86. ISSN 0952-0767. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. ANDRONICEANU, A., J. KINNUNEN and I. GEORGESCU, 2020. E-Government clusters in the EU based on the Gaussian Mixture Models. Administratie si Management Public, 35, 6-20. ISSN 2559-6489. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. ANGELOPOULOS, S., F. KITSIOS, P. KOFAKIS and T. PAPADOPOULOS, 2010. Emerging Barriers in E-Government Implementation. In: Wimmer, M. A., Chappelet, J. L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H. J., eds. Electronic Government. EGOV 2010, s. 216-225. ISBN 978-3-642-14799-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. ARDIELLI, E. and R. VAVREK, 2019. Evaluation of Egovernment and Good Governance Development in EU Member Countries. ACC Journal, 25(2). ISSN 2571-0613. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. AVOTRA, A. A. R. N., Y. CHENGANG, T. R. SANDRA MARCELLINE, A. ASAD and Y. YINGFEI, 2021. Examining the Impact of E-Government on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: The Mediating Effect of Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, Corruption, and Information and Communication Technologies Development During the COVID era. Front. Psychol, 13. ISSN 1664-1078. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. BULIVOU, G., K. G. REDDY and M. G. M. KHAN, 2022. A Novel Method of Clustering Using a Stochastic Approach. IEEE Acces, 10, 117925-117943. ISSN 2169-3536. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2023. The Digital Economy and Society index (DESI). European Commission [online]. [cit. 25. August 2023]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.
    9. EUROSTAT, 2023. Digital Economy and Society. Eurostat [online]. [cit. 25. August 2023]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society/database.
    10. FAN, M., M. EPADILE, S. A. QALATI and N. A. QURESHI, 2022. The Effects of eGovernment Efficiency on Subjective Wellbeing. Front. Psychol. 13, 768540. ISSN 1664-1078. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. FURUHOLT, B. and F. WAHID, 2008. E-government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: the Case of Sragen. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), s. 411-411. ISBN 978-0-7695-3075-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. GOVENDER, P. and V. SIVAKUMAR, 2019. Application of k-means and hierarchical clustering techniques for analysis of air pollution: A review (1980-2019). Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11(1), 40-56. ISSN 1309-1042. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. GRÖNLUND, A., 2010. Ten Years of E-Government: The 'End of History' and New Beginning. In: Wimmer, M. A., Chappelet, J. L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H. J., eds. Electronic Government. EGOV 2010, s. 13-24. ISBN 978-3-642-14799-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. HUYSMANS, X., 2007. Privacy-friendly Identity Management in eGovernment. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Duquenoy, P., Zuccato, A., Martucci, L., eds. The Future of Identity in the Information Society. Privacy and Identity 2007. IFIP - The International Federation for Information Processing. ISBN 978-0-387-79026-8.
    15. KHALIL, N., U. ALI, K. CEMIL and S. FRIEDRICH, 2022. E-government, education quality, internet access in schools, and tax evasion, Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). ISSN 2332-2039. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. IVIĆ, A. et al., 2022. The Challenges and Opportunities in Adopting AI, IoT and Blockchain Technology in E-Government: A Systematic Literature Review. In: International Conference on Communications, Information, Electronic and Energy Systems (CIEES), s. 1-6. ISSN 2602-2052. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. LECHNER, T., 2013. Economic Impacts of ICT Implementation in Public Administration: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Politická ekonomie, 61(5), 675-690. ISSN 2336-8225. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. LYKIDIS, I., D. GEORGE and R. KONSTANTINOS, 2021. "The Use of Blockchain Technology in e-Government Services" Computers, 10(12). ISSN 2073-431X. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. MACLEAN, D. and R. TITAH, 2021. A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 23-38. ISSN 1540-6210. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. MENSAH, I. K., P. VERA and J. MI, 2018. Factors determining the use of e-government services: An empirical study on Russian students in China. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 10(2), 1-19. ISSN 1937-9633. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. MENSAH, I. K., G. ZENG and C. LUO, 2020. E-Government Services Adoption: An Extension of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption. SAGE Open, 10(2). ISSN 2158-2440. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. MENSAH, I. K., G. ZENG and D. S. MWAKAPESA, 2022. Understanding the drivers of the public value of e-government: Validation of a public value e-government adoption model. Front. Psychol, 13. ISSN 1664-1078. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. MOON, M. J., 2002. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62, 424-433. ISSN 1540-6210. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. MUKAKA, M. M., 2012. A guide to appropriate use of Correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Yournal, 24(3), 69-71. ISSN 1995-7270.
    25. PALVIA, S. C. J. and S. S. SHARMA, 2007. E-Government and E-Governance: Definitions/Domain Framework and Status around the World. International Conference on E-governance, 5(1), 1-12. ISSN 2993-2793.
    26. PÉREZ-MOROTE, R., C. PONTONES-ROSA and M. NÚÑEZ-CHICHARRO, 2020. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973. ISSN 0040-1625. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. SAMSOR, A. M., 2021. Challenges and Prospects of e-Government implementation in Afghanistan. International Trade, Politics and Development, 5(1), 51-70. ISSN 2586-3932. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. SIDDIQUEE, N. A., 2016. E-government and transformation of service delivery in developing countries: The Bangladesh experience and lessons. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(3), 368-390. ISSN 1750-6166. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. SHAREEF, M. A., 2021. e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government information quarterly, 28(1), 17-35. ISSN 0740-624X. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. SOUHRAN, Z., T. K. PRIYAMBODO and M. ROKHMAN, 2019. eGovernment Transformation: Literature Review. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(6). ISSN 2277-8616.
    31. SRIVASTAVA, S. C. and T. S. H. TEO, 2007. E-Government Payoffs: Evidence from Cross-Country Data. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 15(4). ISSN 2470-8542. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. UNITED NATIONS, 2023. Country data. United Nations [online]. [cit. 21. July 2023]. Available from: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center.
    33. WORLD BANK, 2019. Registering Property. World Bank [online]. [cit. 25. August 2023]. Available from: https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploretopics/registering-property.
    34. ZHENG, Y., 2016. The impact of E-participation on corruption: A cross-country analysis. International Review of Public Administration, 21(2). ISSN 2331-7795. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Zpět na obsah